« Black Dahlia 2? | Filmstalker | Hitcher remake inside word »

Promotion


TV Film tells true Wolf Creek

WolfCreek_Poster.jpgWolf Creek (review) was a film that was inspired by different tales and events, the filmmakers even said as much, it is an amalgamation. However the UK TV channel ITV are teaming up with the Australian channel Network Ten to create a TV film which will look at the real life events of one of these incidents, that of the murdered British backpacker, Peter Falconio.

According to The Guardian the film...

...will include a reconstruction of the couple's night-time abduction at Barrow Creek in the Northern Territory, where Mr Falconio was shot dead and Ms Lees was forced to hide for nearly five hours in the bush.

Bradley John Murdoch, a mechanic, was found guilty of murder and sentenced to life imprisonment in Darwin last year. But Yorkshire-born Falconio's body was never discovered.

For those of you who don't know the story, Ms Lees was viewed as a suspect for a very long time in the case, since no one could understand how she escaped nor find evidence of the killer. However it wasn't until Murdoch was eventually arrested a year later and DNA evidence matched his shirt to the crime scene that Lees was vindicated.

Much of the storyline will be seen through the eyes of crown prosecutor Rex Wild, played by veteran Australian actor Bryan Brown...

So it's a court room drama with flashbacks, and it promises to be both controversial and attention grabbing.





Promotion


Comments

Personally I'll be interested to see if this raises as much of a stink as what Wolf Creek did. I suspect not, given that this is the "authorised" version rather than a fictional conflation of the Falconio and Ivan Milat cases, but I wonder if the guy from the Sun Herald will get as worked up about this film exploiting the story as he did with Wolf Creek.

Well Wolf Creek's release in Australia was delayed in order for the Falconio case to complete. I can see why they did that though, there are some similarities, particularly in a later scene.

There's always different sides to a film based on fact isn't there? There's a degree of exploitation, but there's also the fact that so many people around the world were made aware of the events that weren't before, and that's always a good thing.

I guess this goes back to the historical accuracies in film again. If the film is quite distant from the events then it has more license, if it's close then it should remain true to the facts and has an obligation.

In the case of Wolf Creek the filmmakers were clear that this was a mixture of different events.

Promotion


Add a comment

Tagline

Site Navigation

Latest Stories

Partner

LOVEFiLM.png

Vidahost image

Latest Reviews

Promotion

Filmstalker Poll

Promotion

Subscribe with...

AddThis Feed Button

Windows Live Alerts

Site Feeds

Subscribe to Filmstalker:

Filmstalker's FeedAll articles

Filmstalker's Reviews FeedReviews only

Filmstalker's Reviews FeedAudiocasts only

Subscribe to the Filmstalker Audiocast on iTunesAudiocasts on iTunes

Feed by email:

Contact

My Skype status



SkypeTwitterPlurkFacebookMyBlogLogLinkedInIMDB

Help Out


Feedback

Site Information

Creative Commons License
© www.filmstalker.co.uk

Give credit to your sources. Quote and credit, don't steal


Movable Type 3.34

There's a shortage of perfect breasts in this world. It would be a pity to damage yours
- Westley, The Princess Bride