« Grand Theft Auto: The movie? | Filmstalker | Indiana Jones IV will be about aliens? »


McG talks Terminator 4

McG.jpgMcG is the director of the next Terminator film, like it or not, and he's been talking about the film and maybe giving us more mis-information about Terminator 4.

He talks about his ideal casting for Terminator and hints who he would like to play the role, and he says that John Connor will play a major part in the film - didn't the producers already say he didn't?

So I am confused because since July of last year the producers have been talking about the plot and saying that John Connor is not the focus of the film, in fact there's going to be a new hero.

Even recently when the plot was revealed in December, the talk was of the new main character being Marcus, a man who wakes up some fifteen years before the future we saw in the original Terminator, he joins John Connor's resistance and starts the good fight.

So now, in an interview over at 213 through AITH, he says:

"John Connor's a major player in it - Christian Bale's playing that part."

I am confused. No matter, let's move on to something more interesting, the fact that maybe McG could bring something interesting to the Terminator franchise.

"It was important to me to honor James Cameron's pictures and I spoke to him for a long time, he's down in New Zealand doing Avatar, and he was very encouraging saying "Look, I was in the same spot following Ridley Scott on the second Aliens picture - it's like, what are you doing, it's Ridley!" And he said, "I wanted to be respectful of the film by Ridley, but I wanna go in a direction where hopefully I can satisfy the hard core fans, but also build upon what's put before us." And I would never be so bold as to say that we're going to be successful, but we're certainly going to do our best and I think we're greatly protected by Christian Bale."

I don't think banking on Christian Bale being in the film is the best bet, but from his retelling of his talk with James Cameron it does sound like he's trying to keep on the right track and that he's really thinking of franchise and doing right by it.

In a way Terminator Salvation: The Future Begins to Terminator is comparable to the move from Alien to Aliens. The scope of the plot is opened way up, it's no longer a single enemy in our world but a whole raft of enemies with the good guys outnumbered in their world, perhaps he's got his head into this after all.

The question still remains as to whether he really can create a strong Terminator film, and if it won't just become a big action film with loads of fantastical set pieces.

On the subject of his perfect Terminator he compares the move from the huge physical presence of Arnie to someone like Robert Patrick, and eventually he says:

"...there's guys out there like Russell Crowe and Eric Bana, bring a good physicality, they do what they do, but I don't know if they're exactly right at the end of the day. (Smiles) Josh Brolin is a very exciting actor - we'll see."

Josh Brolin? After No Country for Old Men (Filmstalker Review)? I'm not so sure, I really do think that is his dream casting for the role, but if they could get Christian Bale on board, perhaps they could just surprise us all.



I'm a little confused too. McG seems like he has a clear vision and an eye on what Cameron did so well. I'm getting the feeling that with this new Terminator movie we will be seeing something close to T1 and T2 where didn't want to (sadly) go, thanks to Jonathan Mostow.

Is Bale really that bankable? I'll guess after The Dark Knight he may well be, but I'm sure there are more fans of Batman than there is Terminator (and Bale?), but we'll see.

Josh Brolin seems like a good choice, but as the film is set in the future do we really need Terminators with skin?

We'll just have to wait until we see at least some footage, but until then, so far so... umm...

i wouldn't go so far as to say Bale is bankable at all. no one is these days lol...

...and you know what, the McGeester produces some good stuff. He has never really been that serious, and quite frankly is a bit too over the top with his absurd one liners and what not ( writers? ), but he can entertain.

watch "supernatural". he made what can arguably be considered THE GUY SHOW of this day and age. He knows what men want.

now if he can only keep the giant mechanical spiders out of this one...

The timeline of Terminators is always something I've thought about because it goes something like:

Robot - Muscle bound humanoid - Shape changer - Female

Although I really don't think that last one is much of an advancement (no offense meant to females!).

So this one is supposed to be somewhere just before muscle bound, at the first humanoid Terminators built. Would that look like Josh Brolin?

Perhaps they build a normal humanoid and find them too easily destroyed so they build the stronger, more unstoppable Arnie model - bigger and better?

Depends how much research the robots did, if they only got to the 70's then moustaches were a manly sign, or it could be a but before the shape shifter, attempting to be discreet.

As for Bale being bankable .. maybe not in the traditional sense, but he is a sensible actor. ie; he hasn't been in any films that were plain crap, so it's a good indication having him on-board. (Just wait for the news that he's left & that's when you worry)


Add a comment


Site Navigation

Latest Stories



Vidahost image

Latest Reviews


Filmstalker Poll


Subscribe with...

AddThis Feed Button

Windows Live Alerts

Site Feeds

Subscribe to Filmstalker:

Filmstalker's FeedAll articles

Filmstalker's Reviews FeedReviews only

Filmstalker's Reviews FeedAudiocasts only

Subscribe to the Filmstalker Audiocast on iTunesAudiocasts on iTunes

Feed by email:


My Skype status


Help Out


Site Information

Creative Commons License
© www.filmstalker.co.uk

Give credit to your sources. Quote and credit, don't steal

Movable Type 3.34