« Golden Globe Winners 2009 | Filmstalker | Star talks Tron 2.0 »


Two-Face could be in Batman 3?

TwoFace.jpgNot so long ago, Aaron Eckhart was suggesting that there would be no Two-Face in Batman 3. The character was dead, and that was pretty much it.

Despite what happened to him in The Dark Knight (Filmstalker review), there is still the possiblilty that he will be back. Eckhart has alluded to the fact that it might not all be over for Two-Face.

In September this year, Aaron Eckhart was talking about the potential of Two-Face making an appearance in Batman 3. It wasn't looking good with Eckhart saying:

He is dead as a door nail...I asked Chris [Nolan] that question and he goes, 'You're dead' before I could even get the question out of my mouth. 'Hey Chris, am I?' 'You're dead!' Alright, cool.

It wouldn't be the first time that a supposedly dead character reappeared though. And when he was interviewed at the Golden Globes by MTV, Eckhart sounded a least a little bit more positive.

I think Harvey — if he’s not dead — is in a serious coma, and I’m not sure he’s coming out. They might pull the plug on him.

Well atleast we have an "if", instead of he's dead end of story. Surely Two-Face in Batman 3 would truely be a man out of revenge. Would make for an interesting plot, alongside whoever the other villains are.

Do you want Two-Face back for Batman 3? Or do you want a whole new plot and new villains?



I remember saying somewhere in another post comments, but there's nothing to say that he is dead other than he lies there with the others looking at him.

Even then I don't think they specifically say he's dead do they?

They are missing a huge trick as Two-Face would make a great villain for his own film.

Saying that though, and again it's something I say a lot, Christopher Nolan has said he doesn't even have an idea for the next film that would work or that he would want to make.

If he wasn't dead it makes Gordon seem a bit of a pratt doesn't it? His whole motivation for the last segment of the film was to 'save Harvey', so if Dent was actually just very badly injured would it not be better to, you know, call for an ambulance rather than just standing about looking moody and making speeches about how cool Batman is?

We'll hunt him.

Excuse me...

Because he can take it.

Any chance of a pain killer...

Because he's the Dark Knight.

Hello? Can you see me down here..? Oh never mind.

Heh. Yeah, given Nolan's Batman is set in a more realistic world, makes it harder to explain the whole back from the dead thing. I'm sure Joel Schumacher could pull it off, shudder.

I'm sure he could, except regenerated Two-face would have big nipples and a neon hat.


He could have been unconscious! You know that whole ending never worked for me anyway, why do they have to make Batman take the blame? Why not pin it all on the Joker? He was the bad guy and Batman gets off scot free as the hero?!


Add a comment


Site Navigation

Latest Stories



Vidahost image

Latest Reviews


Filmstalker Poll


Subscribe with...

AddThis Feed Button

Windows Live Alerts

Site Feeds

Subscribe to Filmstalker:

Filmstalker's FeedAll articles

Filmstalker's Reviews FeedReviews only

Filmstalker's Reviews FeedAudiocasts only

Subscribe to the Filmstalker Audiocast on iTunesAudiocasts on iTunes

Feed by email:


My Skype status


Help Out


Site Information

Creative Commons License
© www.filmstalker.co.uk

Give credit to your sources. Quote and credit, don't steal

Movable Type 3.34