« Another Countess Báthory film starring Swinton? | Filmstalker | Spike Lee to direct terrorist thriller »


Straw Dogs remake director talks rating

StrawDogs.jpgThe remake of the classic Straw Dogs, the Sam Peckinpah film which saw Susan George and Dustin Hoffman go through some extremely brutal and harrowing scenes, has completed filming, and the new director has spoken out about the tone of the film and how it compares to the original.

For many of us, and myself included, the talk was that we were concerned it would be a watered down, teen-friendly version of the original, as so many of the horror remakes of late have been. Not only that but they also lost the sense of the originals, and in some cases just became straight out horror films without the soul of the original.

That looks like it could be different with this remake of Straw Dogs, if the director is anything to go by.

The plot of the remake sounds very much like the original:

James Marsden plays a Hollywood screenwriter who relocates with his wife to her hometown in Mississippi. Kate Bosworth plays the wife, who left the South for LA. to become an actress and returns home so her husband can finish his script in quiet. Alexander Skarsgård plays her high school boyfriend, an ex-football hero who sees the return of his former girlfriend as a way to reclaim glory.

Worth noting is that James Woods, Walton Goggins and Dominic Purcell also star.

From here is where the original seems to kick in, the high school boyfriend begins terrorising the couple when, presumably, he doesn't get his way. Going by the original, there'll be a gang rape scene that's the turn around for the male lead, an event that unlocks something inside him and sets him on his own path of revenge.

The original was pretty intense and gathered a lot of controversy for its time, now Rod Lurie is telling us the same for his version. From Bloody Disgusting:

”I think it’s as intense if not more [than the original]. I keep reading on blogs how we’re gonna have to water things down, and how we’re gonna have to tone down the rape scene, and tone down the violence in the movie, and that’ll be one of the expectations that people have where it’ll [defy] their expectations I think. It’s definitely a hard-‘R’, definitely a hard-‘R’. It’s a tough film, it’s very exciting and very unnerving I would say. But real edge of your seat stuff, I hope.”

Well that sounds rather positive, and not because he keeps saying it's a hard-R, what would be a 15 or 18 in the UK – note that the UK even has a higher category for R18, but then our BBFC is a lot more film focused and less political and religion based than the MPAA – but because he's saying that it's going to be tough and edge of your seat.

To me this sounds like a thriller that's going to shake us up, perhaps as much as the original did, and that means that the film is really going to have to push some boundaries and take some risks, because those boundaries have moved on a little since 1971 haven't they?

It's also going to mean that Kate Bosworth and James Marsden, Bosworth especially, are going to have their images shaken a little, perhaps that's something good for Bosworth's career.



Add a comment


Site Navigation

Latest Stories


Vidahost image

Latest Reviews


Filmstalker Poll


Subscribe with...

AddThis Feed Button

Windows Live Alerts

Site Feeds

Subscribe to Filmstalker:

Filmstalker's FeedAll articles

Filmstalker's Reviews FeedReviews only

Filmstalker's Reviews FeedAudiocasts only

Subscribe to the Filmstalker Audiocast on iTunesAudiocasts on iTunes

Feed by email:


My Skype status


Help Out


Site Information

Creative Commons License
© www.filmstalker.co.uk

Give credit to your sources. Quote and credit, don't steal

Movable Type 3.34