« Filmstalker Films for August 2012 | Filmstalker | The Dying Eye filming in Edinburgh needs you »

Promotion


Are films to blame for violent acts?

LordofWarBullets.jpgFollowing the shooting in Aurora Colorado the media leapt on the fact that the film that was playing at the time was The Dark Knight Rises (Filmstalker review) and the insinuations were flying, the killer was copying and influenced by The Dark Knight Rises, a film he hadn't yet seen. There was no connection made with anything else from the books he read, the people in his life, or the weapons he bought. They were trying to nudge the blame towards the film.

Following that the film news came of films being altered, film-makers being blamed as well as being called to task to think about the violence they put in films, and generally the old "film is evil, corrupts and causes people to kill others" argument came out. Films are to blame for the violence in our society, or at least in American society, and if not just film then videogames, and if not just those then anything from the realm of entertainment.

Yet are films really to blame? Is film reflecting society and providing entertainment rather than driving society forward to acts they had never imagined before or were capable of? Is film really causing people to sporadic and random acts of violence?

I feel that this argument can be killed off really quickly and easily. People have been violent and killing each other since the dawn of time, well before films, videogames, television, radio, plays, before even speech.

Oh but then we were barbarians weren't we, uncontrollable feelings and we just murdered people at random. Well yes but that has described humanity for a very long time. Just because we believe we are civilised through cultures such as Ancient Greeks, Romans, the Victorians and our modern cultures, doesn't mean we have left our animal impulses behind us and they are only magically triggered when we see or hear certain things. In fact these three cultures have seen some of our most violent times and killers existed throughout them all.

Just look to the fact that there were still public executions, essentially executions for entertainment, happening until quite recently in many of our cultures and in some they still occur in the most brutal and shocking ways. In each of those three seemingly civilised cultures the execution of people was put on public display.

So what can we blame it on? Is it really as simple as just blaming humans and our animal instincts? Some cultures, groups and races have been far more violent than others; some have used their own power and influence to control armies to destroy other cultures, groups and races, and all done without the influence of films, videogames or television.

Can we turn to weapons and the availability of them to any individual and blame that? The fact that a random person can pick up thousands of rounds of ammunition, guns of all descriptions and even grenades?

Or do we turn to society and say that the real problem is the fact that people feel that they cannot live a normal life and have the desire to kill others in order to attract the attention of the media, blaming anything they can to get headlines and grab their few days of fame.

Could it be that the media throw them too much attention, creating this global awareness of the person behind what they have done and through the stories no matter how repulsive or shocking, deliver them exactly what they wanted in the first place?

Films and entertainment are clearly not the problem and if you are saying that then you are writing off all of the other statements above ignoring war, violent cultures, public executions, religions, and so on.

My belief is that the first step is a refocusing of the media and when an event such as this happens we need to ignore the person responsible and not even waste time deriding them. Talk of the victims and the terrible things they have to deal with but give the killer nothing not even a single column inch.

Then there really has to be recognition of need for gun control. How can you blame any form of entertainment, never mind the violence and gun light films such as the Batman series when someone can walk out and get thousands of rounds of ammunition along with various guns with which to fire them? Surely it would help to regulate the items that allow them to carry out such killings first? Doesn't that make the smallest amount of sense? Oh perhaps the argument of "from my cold, dead hands" would arise, well please let that prophecy pass, you take the place of the victims and have your wish come true while the innocent remain alive with their families and we can prise the guns away from you.

After that we need to address the people and what drove them to this place. Why did they feel the need to kill others to gain the attention? What was wrong with their life that they didn't get what they needed from it? When you look at these people you can't simply say they were crazy psychotics and if you did we should then be asking why they weren't recognised as such and treated.

How can you in anyway way blame entertainment and suddenly leap to cancelling events, re-editing films, censorship by the minority in reactionary fear and even discussions from prominent people within the entertainment industry saying that it is the moralistic duty of film-makers to stop showing violence. Really? Is that going to help?

In 1977 there was a court case that referenced the television series Kojak and blamed it as the cause of the murderer's actions, even the star of the show Telly Savalas appeared in the court. Did it win and get the murderer off? No. That's why the television show was pulled into the case by the lawyers in the first place, anything to have the killer found not guilty or reduce their sentence. However it didn't work, and let me point out the obvious that Kojak was not a film and was far from the violence we see on film these days.

Which brings me to another point, someone is sure to say that films, games and television are more violent these days, but if that were the case then where is the comparative increase in these killings that can be directly related to entertainment? Even if there really is an increase in violent acts and not just in the media reporting on them, can it be directly related to entertainment? I've certainly witnessed more media coverage in murders in recent years and more focus on pointing the finger, apportioning blame and making sensationalised television in order to get viewers turning to their news programme.

What do you believe is at fault for these violent acts? Should we start seeing violent films cut back and once again blame the entertainment for people murdering each other letting the real reasons slide by without scrutinising them or trying to find a resolution?

Recently I asked readers, in a poll that you can still see running on the site, what they thought caused violence and as of writing the results are as follows:

People - 58.33%
Media - 16.67%
Films - 8.33%
Religion - 8.33%
Videogames - 8.33%
Television, Books, Comics, Plays and Guns - 0%

Do you agree with those results? The majority are clearly saying its people that kill and are responsible for these killings and coming in second place is the media themselves, clearly I'm not alone with my thoughts. There are a few that believe it could be films and videogames, but just as many believe its religion. Interesting results.

Well you can have your say while the poll is still running by selecting the options you feel are responsible or typing in your own, and you can get discussing it in the comments below, on the Facebook Page or the Google Plus Page where you will find this article highlighted as well as the poll.




Promotion


Comments

of couse theres only people to blame for violance, but how can we justify the fact that there's more blood in any other movie than it used to be before? I think directors should create more positive films, because there's enough cruelty in our everyday life and when I go to the theater I dont wanna stress out and watch my back in case some psyco, who watched too much of a Batman movie, will start shooting people. for comparison, recently I watched Metropolis movie, an old school sci-fi silent movie and I had a time of my life! it was interesting to watch it, because its like no other! back in days people knew how to make a real film and not some kind of cheap action movie...by the way, I can share a link if anyone wants to see Metropolis , its metropolismovie.co.uk! Enjoy it

I know you’re just posting a comment to market your link, but I couldn’t let this go unanswered.

“how can we justify the fact that there's more blood in any other movie than it used to be before?” – Well how can we justify that there are more car accidents in films than there used to? Plane crashes? Terrorists? 3D? One point would be why it needs justifying and the other would be it is merely a reflection of real life.

As for directors creating more positive films well there are hundreds out there you just have to look. There are positive films galore and Hollywood alone churns out more romantic comedies and comedies than anyone else. Bollywood delivers more positive films and mostly with no sex or violence. Independent film delivers so many more different types of films not to mention the wonderful world of positive documentaries – I’ve just watched The Island President for one.

You’ve also just contradicted yourself by stating that this “psycho” “watched too much of a Batman movie” yet it is becoming very clear this is not the reason since it now seems, according to news reports coming out, that his psychiatrist was trying to warn police about his behaviour before the events. It wasn’t because he watched too much of a movie at all, but because he was a mentally unbalanced person with access to large amounts of weaponry.

What film are the Sikh temple shootings in Wisconsin going to be blamed on then?

Promotion


Add a comment

(If you haven't left a comment on Filmstalker before, you may need to be approved before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

Tagline

Site Navigation

Latest Stories

Partner

Vidahost image

Latest Reviews

Promotion

Filmstalker Poll

Promotion

Subscribe with...

AddThis Feed Button

Site Feeds

Subscribe to Filmstalker:

Filmstalker's FeedAll articles

Filmstalker's Reviews FeedReviews only

Filmstalker's Reviews FeedAudiocasts only

Subscribe to the Filmstalker Audiocast on iTunesAudiocasts on iTunes

Feed by email:

Contact

TwitterFacebookSkypePlurkLinkedInIMDB

Help Out

Site Information

Creative Commons License
© www.filmstalker.co.uk

Give credit to your sources. Quote and credit, don't steal


Movable Type 3.34

It's like meeting God without dying.
- Dorothy Parker on meeting Orson Welles